News Stories

Warners talks Workflow Report

A look at Warner Bros. Next Generation Production Workflows Report kicked off the Workflows Supersession at the 2011 HPA Tech Retreat, Tuesday in Palm Springs.
The project team tested 20 workflows, working with roughly 30 vendors. Among the technologies were a variety of cameras including Alexa, Red and DSLR; ACES; and CineSlate, a new type of slate developed by Sony.
Each workflow had a data repository, transcoding, DAM, and color management.
Goals included delivery of editorial media, digital dailies, DVD dailies and archived backups.
Categories of study included:
–Customer integrated systems
–Plug and play systems
–Next generation (including 3D and cloud computing)

Discussing the findings were Sean Cooney, VP, advanced production technology at Warners; Jonathan Smiles, digital production supervisor; Marco Bario of Creative Science, production and post consultant; and Nathan Gunn, editor.

Gunn: “Our plan on the editorial side was to take production and workflow all the way to finishing. It was the same workflow we would do in a cutting room on a production, including prepping for finishing. This included making sure there was a uniformity for deliverables.”

Cooney: “(Post facilities) are starting to behave as a necessary data hub. But you need to push data to remote locations. Right now we are constrained by bandwidth, as that loosens we’ll need a near-set presence (and a facility presence).”

Bario: “There are tools and talent. The facilities today have talent. The centre for knowledge isn’t to be underestimated.”

Cooney on ACES: “Our experience was positive working with ACES. We were able to communicate the creative intent. It works; the question is will people adopt it.”

Smiles on metadata generated from 3D rigs: “Accuracy is beyond what you ever required in the 2D world.”

Sean: “With DAM, you need automation. Very few systems are out of the box. That is one of the challenges for a producer. You really have to plan earlier. You have to have these discussions almost at the point where you get the green light.”

Gunn agreed: “You need to bring all the players in early, to build the optimum workflow and define the roles.”

Asked will there be standardized workflows, Smiles suggested: “I could see two or three workflows per camera system. Beyond that, it becomes tweaking.”

Gunn: “The cutting room becomes a centralized hub where all the information comes in and gets disseminated to the various departments. I think there is a need to bring the editorial process in even earlier.”

Cooney concluded: “I came away with a sense of optimism. There are a lot of toolsets that have been developed over the past two years, and now a lot of facilities and companies have made great strides. It looks like the next phase is going to be integration. I think the integration is going to give us some efficiencies.”

< PREVIOUS ARTICLES

Specification for Naming VFX Image Sequences Released

ETC’s VFX Working Group has published a specification for best practices naming image sequences such as plates and comps. File naming is an essential tool for organizing the multitude of frames that are inputs and outputs from the VFX process. Prior to the publication of this specification, each organization had its own naming scheme, requiring custom processes for each partner, which often resulted in confusion and miscommunication.

The new ETC@USC specification focuses primarily on sequences of individual images. The initial use case was VFX plates, typically delivered as OpenEXR or DPX files. However, the team soon realized that the same naming conventions can apply to virtually any image sequence. Consequently, the specification was written to handle a wide array of assets and use cases.

To ensure all requirements are represented, the working group included over 2 dozen participants representing studios, VFX houses, tool creators, creatives and others.  The ETC@USC also worked closely with MovieLabs to ensure that the specification could be integrated as part of their 2030 Vision.

A key design criteria for this specification is compatibility with existing practices.  Chair of the VFX working group, Horst Sarubin of Universal Pictures, said: “Our studio is committed to being at the forefront of designing best industry practices to modernize and simplify workflows, and we believe this white paper succeeded in building a new foundation for tools to transfer files in the most efficient manner.”

This specification is compatible with other initiatives such as the Visual Effects Society (VES) Transfer Specifications. “We wanted to make it as seamless as possible for everyone to adopt this specification,” said working group co-chair and ETC@USC’s Erik Weaver. “To ensure all perspectives were represented we created a team of industry experts familiar with the handling of these materials and collaborated with a number of industry groups.”

“Collaboration between MovieLabs and important industry groups like the ETC is critical to implementing the 2030 Vision,” said Craig Seidel, SVP of MovieLabs. “This specification is a key step in defining the foundations for better software-defined workflows. We look forward to continued partnership with the ETC on implementing other critical elements of the 2030 Vision.”

The specification is available online for anyone to use.

Oops, something went wrong.