Samsung Electronics Co., the world’s largest flat-screen television maker by shipments, said glasses-free three-dimensional TV sets won’t be a common household item in the next five to 10 years because technical hurdles still exist before such TVs can be mass-produced at an affordable price.
B.K. Yoon, Samsung Electronics’ visual-display president, said at a forum that while 3D without glasses is possible on cellphones and other small mobile devices, there are still challenges for 3D TVs.
However, rival Toshiba Corp. of Japan earlier this month unveiled the world’s first glasses-free 3D liquid-crystal-display television sets, less than a year after most set makers launched 3D television sets that require the cumbersome eyewear. The company has said it plans to start selling the glasses-free TVs in December.
The cutthroat nature of the television-set industry is marked by precipitous price declines every year and innovations that threaten to cannibalize promising technologies even before companies can cash in on years of research and development.
As 3D content becomes more prevalent in movies and video games, electronics companies are trying to do away with the glasses that help create the illusion of depth.
Many analysts agree with Samsung, noting that it will likely take at least five years to bring the glasses-free 3D TVs into living rooms at an affordable price.
Television makers are ramping up for a holiday shopping season during which 3D television sets are expected to be a major driver of sales. Research firm DisplaySearch said it expects global shipments of 3.4 million 3D television sets in 2010, accounting for roughly 5% of the total flat-panel set market.
Samsung said earlier that its 2010 sales of 3D TVs may outpace last year’s sales of its more traditional offerings even as it struggles to cope with the surge in demand.
Samsung’s hometown rival LG Electronics Inc. launched its 3D TVs in March and said it expects its sales of such TVs to reach more than one million units this year.
By JUNG-AH LEE And DAISUKE WAKABAYASHI
original post: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704361504575551882741451978.html?mod=googlenews_wsj